CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ65044623 ↗
Source-derived summary

The following are the national records in Olympic weightlifting in the Netherlands. Records are maintained in each weight class for the snatch lift, clean and jerk lift, and the total for both lifts by the Dutch Weightlifting Association (Nederlandse Gewichthefbond).

Editorial summary

“List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting” enters the record as wikimedia list article. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what List, Dutch and records can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 40-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around List, Dutch and records.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, List, Dutch and records provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q65044623. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting primary sources, List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “List of Dutch records in Olympic weightlifting” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.