CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of Cyrillic multigraphs

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ15650597 ↗
Source-derived summary

The following multigraphs are used in the Cyrillic script. The palatalized consonants of Russian and other languages written as C-⟨ь⟩ are mostly predictable and therefore not included here unless they are irregular. Likewise, in the languages of the Caucasus, there are numerous other predictable multigraphs that are not included. These include doubled letters (or whole digraphs) that indicate 'tense' ('strong') consonants and long vowels; sequences with ⟨в⟩, ⟨у⟩, ⟨ә⟩ for labialized consonants; and sequences with ⟨Ӏ⟩ or ⟨ъ⟩ for ejective consonants or pharyngealized consonants and vowels. Tatar also has discontinuous digraphs.

А

⟨аа⟩:

Archi: [aː]

⟨ааӀ⟩:

Archi: [aːˤ]

⟨ан⟩:

Dungan: [æ̃]

⟨аь⟩:

Chechen: [æ]

Ingush: [æ]

Tabasaran: [æ]

⟨аӀ⟩:

Archi: [aˤ]

В

⟨вь⟩:

Shughni: [w]

Г

⟨гв⟩:

Abaza: [ɡʷ]

Archi: [gʷ]

Lezgian: [gʷ]

⟨гг⟩:

Tabasaran: [ɣ]

⟨гу⟩:

Adyghe: [ɡʷ]

Kabardian: [ɡʷ]

Ossetian: [ɡʷ]

Also found in several other languages where ⟨у⟩ is used for labialization (though this is a predictable effect of assimilation, and therefore does not result in a true digraph).

⟨гў⟩:

Aleut language (Bering dialect): [w]

⟨гъ⟩:

Abaza: [ʁ]

Adyghe: [ʁ]

Aghul: [ʁ]

Archi: [ʁ]

Avar: [ʁ]

Bezhta: [ʁ]

Crimean Tatar: [ɣ]

Dargwa: [ɣ]

Kabardian: [ʁ]

Karachay-Balkar: [ʁ]

Kumyk: [ʁ]

Lezgian: [ʁ]

Ossetian: [ʁ]

Tabasaran: [ʕ]

Tatar: word-final [ʁ]

⟨гъв⟩:

Abaza: [ʁʷ]

Archi: [ʁʷ]

Lezgian: [ʁʷ]

⟨гъу⟩:

Adyghe: [ʁʷ]

Kabardian: [ʁʷ]

Ossetian: [ʁʷ]

⟨гъь⟩:

Abaza: [ʁʲ]

⟨гъӀ⟩:

Archi: [ʁˤ]

⟨гъӀв⟩:

Archi: [ʁˤʷ]

⟨гь⟩:

Abaza: [ɡʲ]

Abkhaz: [ɡʲ]

Aghul: [h]

Archi: [h]

Avar: [ɦ]

Bezhta: [h]

Dargwa: [h]

Kumyk: [h]

Lezgian: [h]

Shughni: [ɣ]

Tabasaran: [h]

⟨гә⟩:

Abkhaz: [ɡʷ]

⟨гӀ⟩:

Abaza: [ʕ]

Aghul: [ʕ]

Archi: [ʕ]

Avar: [ʕ]

Chechen: [ɣ]

Dargwa: [ʡ]

Ingush: [ʁ]

⟨гӀв⟩:

Abaza: [ʕʷ]

Ӷ

⟨ӷь⟩:

Abkhaz: [ʁʲ]

⟨ӷә⟩:

Abkhaz: [ʁʷ]

Д

⟨дж⟩

Abaza: [d͡ʒ]

Adyghe: [d͡ʒ]

Aghul: [d͡z]

Belarusian: [d͡ʐ]

Bulgarian: [d͡ʒ]

Crimean Tatar: [d͡ʒ]

Dargwa: [d͡ʒ]

Kabardian: [d͡ʒ]

Karachay-Balkar: [d͡ʒ] (Karachay); [d͡z] (Balkar)

Komi: [d͡ʒ]

Lezgian: [d͡ʒ]

Ossetian: [d͡ʒ]

Russian: [d͡ʐ]

Tabasaran: [d͡ʒ]

Ukrainian: [d͡ʒ]

⟨джв⟩

Abaza: [d͡ʒʷ]

⟨джь⟩

Abaza: [d͡ʑ]

⟨дз⟩

Abaza: [d͡z]

Adyghe: [d͡z]

Belarusian: [d͡z]

Bulgarian: [d͡z]

Dargwa: [d͡z]

Kabardian: [d͡z]

Komi: [d͡ʑ]

Lezgian: [d͡z]

Ossetian: [d͡z]

Russian: [d͡z]

Shughni: [d͡z]

Tabasaran: [d͡z]

Ukrainian: [d͡z]

⟨дзу⟩:

Adyghe: [d͡zʷ]

⟨дч⟩:

Russian: [t͡ɕ] (though this is a predictable effect of assimilation, and therefore not a true digraph)

⟨дь⟩:

Yakut: [d͡ʑ]

⟨дә⟩:

Abkhaz: [dʷ]

Е

⟨ее⟩

Archi: [eː]

⟨ееӀ⟩

Archi: [eːˤ]

⟨еӀ⟩

Archi: [eˤ]

Ё

⟨ён⟩:

Dungan: [jɔ̃]

⟨ёь⟩:

Chechen: [jø]

Ж

⟨жв⟩

Abaza: [ʒʷ]

Archi: [ʒʷ]

Tabasaran: [ʒʷ]

⟨жд⟩:

Russian: usually not a digraph, and pronounced [ʐd] (palatalized to [ʐdʲ] before ⟨ь⟩ and palatalizing vowels). However, in the word дождь ("rain") and its derivatives, the conservative Moscow pronunciation uses the sound [ʑː] (devoiced to [ɕː] in the nominative singular of дождь). The unpalatalized pronunciation [ʐː] in these words (unlike words with ⟨жж⟩ or ⟨зж⟩) is uncommon and considered nonstandard.

⟨жж⟩:

Russian: usually not a digraph, and pronounced [ʐː].

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “List of Cyrillic multigraphs” as wikimedia list article. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around List, Cyrillic and multigraphs.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 465-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with List, Cyrillic and multigraphs providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “List of Cyrillic multigraphs”, the useful work is to connect “wikimedia list article” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15650597. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of Cyrillic multigraphs”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of Cyrillic multigraphs primary sources, List of Cyrillic multigraphs archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of Cyrillic multigraphs”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “List of Cyrillic multigraphs” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.