CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cross Island Line

future Mass Rapid Transit line in Singapore

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ3335354 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Cross Island Line (CRL) is a high-capacity Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) line currently under construction in Singapore. It will run in an east–west direction across the planning areas of Changi to Pioneer, passing through Pasir Ris, Hougang, Serangoon, Ang Mo Kio, Bukit Timah, Clementi, Jurong East and Boon Lay. From Pasir Ris, a branch of the line will extend to Punggol. Once fully operational, the 67-kilometre (42 mi) line will replace the East–West Line (EWL) as the longest line on the MRT network, serving approximately 26 stations. It will utilise the CRRC Qingdao Sifang CR151 electric multiple unit (EMU), running in a six-car formation. However, to cater to future demand, stations on the line will be built to accommodate eight-car trains.

Plans for the CRL were first announced in 2013. It is envisioned to serve various key hubs including the Jurong Lake District and the Punggol Digital District, offering an alternative east–west connection to alleviate passenger load on the EWL. Shortly after the announcement, some nature groups called for the diversion of CRL tunnels away from the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR). Despite the calls, the government decided to continue with the original direct route in 2019, citing commuting time, economic factors and long-term energy consumption. The alignment and stations of Phase 1 were finalised in 2019, followed by the Punggol branch in 2020, Phase 2 in 2022, and Phase 3 in 2026.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Cross Island Line” as future Mass Rapid Transit line in Singapore. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cross, Island and Line.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013, 2019, 2020, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cross, Island and Line providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Cross Island Line”, the useful work is to connect “future Mass Rapid Transit line in Singapore” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3335354. The first chronological checks are 2013, 2019, 2020 and 2022.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cross Island Line”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cross Island Line primary sources, Cross Island Line archive and Cross research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cross Island Line”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cross Island Line” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.