CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Archdeacon of Halifax

Church of England ecclesiastical office

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 3, 2025
Entity authorityQ4785772 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Archdeacon of Halifax is the priest in charge of the archdeaconry of Halifax, an administrative division of the Church of England Diocese of Leeds (formerly in the Diocese of Wakefield.)

History

The Archdeaconry was founded (from the Archdeaconry of Craven in the Diocese of Ripon, plus three parishes of the Archdeaconry of York) with the erection of the Diocese of Wakefield on 20 November 1888. From then until its reorganisation in 1927, the archdeaconry of Huddersfield comprised all but the northwestern corner of that diocese. In 1927, the archdeaconry was renamed to that of Halifax and its borders moved to cover the western half of the diocese (the old Halifax archdeaconry became the archdeaconry of Pontefract).

The (second) archdeaconry of Halifax has constituted the western half of the diocese since the 1927 reorganisation, covering the deaneries of Calder Valley, Halifax, Brighouse and Elland, Huddersfield, Almondbury and Kirkheaton. Since the creation of the Diocese of Leeds on 20 April 2014, the archdeaconry forms the Huddersfield episcopal area.

List of archdeacons

Archdeacons of Huddersfield

1888–1892 (res.): Norman Straton

April 1892 – 1913 (ret.): William Donne

1914–1927: Richard Harvey (became Archdeacon of Halifax)

Archdeacons of Halifax

With the diocesan reorganisation of 1927, the archdeaconry was renamed to Halifax.

Editorial summary

“Archdeacon of Halifax” enters the record as church of England ecclesiastical office. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Archdeacon, Halifax and Church can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1888, 1927, 2014, 1892—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Archdeacon, Halifax and Church.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Archdeacon of Halifax” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Archdeacon, Halifax and Church provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4785772. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1888, 1927, 2014 and 1892.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Archdeacon of Halifax”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Archdeacon of Halifax primary sources, Archdeacon of Halifax archive and Archdeacon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Archdeacon of Halifax”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Archdeacon of Halifax” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.