Lisa Pechersky
Canadian soccer player
Elizabeth "Lisa" Pechersky (born June 29, 1998) is a Canadian soccer player who plays for Montreal Roses FC in the Northern Super League.
Early life
Pechersky played youth soccer with North Mississauga SC and the Woodbridge Strikers. She also played with the Ontario provincial team from U14 to U16 level and won a gold medal at the Canadian National Championships with Team Ontario.
College career
In 2016, Pechersky began attending the University of Memphis, where she played for the women's soccer team. In 2017, she redshirted the season, extending her eligibility another season. On October 31, 2019, she scored her first collegiate goal in a victory over the Tulsa Golden Hurricane. At the end of the 2021 Spring season (delayed from the 2020 Fall due to the COVID-19 pandemic), she was named to the All-American Athletic Conference Second Team. She was named to the AAC All-Academic team four times from 2017 to 2020.
Club career
In 2016, Pechersky played with the Woodbridge Strikers in League1 Ontario (women). She returned to play with them in 2018 and 2019.
The public source identifies “Lisa Pechersky” as canadian soccer player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Lisa, Pechersky and Canadian.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Lisa Pechersky”, the useful work is to connect “canadian soccer player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q116167768. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2016, 2017 and 2019.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lisa Pechersky”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lisa Pechersky primary sources, Lisa Pechersky archive and Lisa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lisa Pechersky”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lisa Pechersky” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.