CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lilly Research Centre

medical Research Centre in Surrey

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ60786256
Source-derived summary

The Lilly Research Centre is a medical research centre in Surrey. It is the European headquarters of Eli Lilly and Company.

Construction

Lilly received permission for the site in 1959. The site was built by McAlpine.

The site was to open by August 1967, being 47 acres

From 1967 the catering was provided by the Bateman Catering Organisation

History

The former research site of Lilly was at Bromborough.

In 1968, when the centre opened, Eli Lilly was spending £20m on research in the UK. The average research cost of a new molecular entity is currently over £1bn. In 2003, a £40m investment transformed the site into a Centre of Excellence in Neuroscience Research.

Director of Research at the centre was Bill Dawson, a Fellow of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

In October 2019, Eli Lilly announced the closure of their Erl Wood research centre by the end of 2020 with some staff moving to other Eli Lilly locations in the local area and neuroscience research moving to the USA. A year later, in October 2020, UCB announced they had acquired the site from Lilly and would complete a refurbishment of the site.

Visits

It was featured in a two-part Panorama documentary on 10 and 17 January 1983, presented by Tom Mangold.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Lilly Research Centre” as medical Research Centre in Surrey. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Lilly, Research and Centre.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1959, 1967, 1968, 2003—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1967. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Lilly, Research and Centre providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Lilly Research Centre”, the useful work is to connect “medical Research Centre in Surrey” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60786256. Authority coordinates are 51.376, -0.678. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1959, 1967, 1968 and 2003.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lilly Research Centre”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lilly Research Centre primary sources, Lilly Research Centre archive and Lilly research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lilly Research Centre”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lilly Research Centre” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.