CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Lillie Shultz

Journalist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ104907470
Source-derived summary

Lillie Shultz (1904 – April 14, 1981) was a journalist, a writer, an administrator for the American Jewish Congress, communal worker and activist against discrimination.

Lillie (Lillian) Shultz (also spelled Schultz) served from 1933 to 1944, as chief administrative officer and director of publicity at the American Jewish Congress. She was the only woman on the staff. She served on the governing council, was an editor of the Congress Bulletin; an active member of a committee dealing with the 1936 Olympics.

Schultz advocated against oppression and discrimination, and was instrumental in establishing a commission to investigate economic discrimination against Jews in the United States 1933–1944.

Shultz was a leading member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine in 1947 in the negotiations leading to the United Nations recommendation for the partition of Palestine and was a close colleague and co-worker with the Jewish Agency delegation to the UN. She lobbied against nuclear proliferation.

Shultz was born in 1904, in Philadelphia and graduated from the University of Pennsylvania. After her graduation, and her first job as a journalist was with the Philadelphia Jewish World, editing the English-language section.

In an article entitled “Why I Was Jealous: A Sukkoth Memory,” she elaborated about her love of Jewish culture and recalled her grandfather's prayer and longing that have inspired her, her activism.

Shultz was a staff member in the early 1930s of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, before working for the American Jewish Congress.

Editorial summary

“Lillie Shultz” enters the record as journalist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Lillie, Shultz and Journalist can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1904, 1981, 1933, 1944—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1904-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Lillie, Shultz and Journalist.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Lillie Shultz” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Lillie, Shultz and Journalist provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q104907470. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1904, 1981, 1933 and 1944.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lillie Shultz”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lillie Shultz primary sources, Lillie Shultz archive and Lillie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lillie Shultz”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lillie Shultz” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.