CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bắc Trạch

Commune of Quảng Trị

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ3942472
Source-derived summary

Bắc Trạch is a commune (xã) and village in Quảng Trị Province, Vietnam.

On June 16, 2025, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly issued Resolution No. 1680/NQ-UBTVQH15 on the reorganization of commune-level administrative units in Quảng Trị Province in 2025. Accordingly, Thanh Trạch Commune, Hạ Mỹ Commune, Liên Trạch Commune, and Bắc Trạch Commune were merged to form a new commune named Bắc Trạch Commune.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Bắc Trạch” as commune of Quảng Trị. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Trạch, Commune and Quảng.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2025, 1680—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Trạch, Commune and Quảng providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Bắc Trạch”, the useful work is to connect “commune of Quảng Trị” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3942472. Authority coordinates are 17.683, 106.456. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2025 and 1680.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bắc Trạch”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bắc Trạch primary sources, Bắc Trạch archive and Trạch research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bắc Trạch”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bắc Trạch” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.