Lidia Erokhina
Russian economist
Lidia Ivanovna Erokhina (Russian: Лидия Ивановна Ерохина; 13 December 1955 – 25 February 2026) was a Russian economist.
Life and career
Erokhina was born on 13 December 1955 in the Penza Oblast, and was a member of the Komsomol.
In 1978, Erokhina graduated with honors from the Moscow Institute of Technology with a degree in "engineer-economist". After graduating from postgraduate studies on the distribution of the district committee of the Komsomol, she was sent to the Togliatti branch of the institute, where, since 1982, she worked alternately as an assistant, teacher, head of the department, vice-rector for academic work. In 1995, she became the rector of the institute (now it was the Volga Technological Institute of Service).
In 2009, in the elections to the City Duma, Togliatti, Erokhina ran as the third number one in the party list of the United Russia party, acting as a "political locomotive". Immediately after the election, she refused the deputy mandate.
Erokhina died on 25 February 2026, at the age of 70.
“Lidia Erokhina” enters the record as russian economist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Lidia, Erokhina and Russian can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Lidia Erokhina” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Lidia, Erokhina and Russian provides the most credible route into that argument.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4176769. VIAF identifies the subject as 120144648459135336142. The Library of Congress control number is no00035451. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1955, 2026, 1978 and 1982.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lidia Erokhina”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lidia Erokhina primary sources, Lidia Erokhina archive and Lidia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lidia Erokhina”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lidia Erokhina” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.