Liberalism in Moldova
Open-knowledge reference entry
This article gives an overview of liberalism in the Republic of Moldova. In the years from 1918 through 1940 and 1941 through 1944, what is today the Republic of Moldova was part of Romania, so the Romanian political parties were active in Moldova. It is limited to liberal parties with substantial support, principally those with a history of representation in parliament.
History
After independence from the former Soviet Union numerous liberal parties were founded.
Towards the Liberal Democratic Party of Moldova
1993: The National Liberal Party (PNL) is established.
1995: The Party of Rebirth and Conciliation of Moldova (PRCM) is established.
1997: The Social Democratic Alliance of Moldova (ASDM) is established.
1997: The Popular Democratic Party of Moldova (PDPM) is established.
2000: The PNL merged with the Social-Political Movement "For Order and Justice" (POD) to create the Social Liberal Union Force of Moldova (USLFM).
2001: The Independents' Alliance of Moldova (AIRM) is established.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Liberalism in Moldova” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q17002618. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1918, 1940, 1941 and 1944.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Liberalism in Moldova”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Liberalism in Moldova primary sources, Liberalism in Moldova archive and Liberalism research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Liberalism in Moldova”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Liberalism in Moldova” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.