Liang Tiangeng
Chinese politician
Liang Tiangeng (Chinese: 梁田庚; pinyin: Liáng Tiángēng; born May 1960) is a Chinese politician currently serving as vice chairman of the Hebei Provincial Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.
He was an alternate of the 19th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.
Biography
Liang was born in Dianbai County (now Dianbai District), Guangdong, in May 1960. He was a sent-down youth between September 1976 and September 1979. After resuming the college entrance examination, in 1979, he entered South China Agricultural University, majoring in agricultural economic management. Upon graduation in April 1983, he joined the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
After university in 1983, Liang was assigned to the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries (later was reshuffled as the Ministry of Agriculture). He stayed there for 25 long years, interspersed with short stays in the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party from April 1995 to January 1998 and the Guizhou Provincial Economic System Reform Commission from January 1998 and May 1999.
Liang was appointed head of the Organization Department of the CCP Tibetan Autonomous Regional Committee in March 2012 and was admitted to member of the Standing Committee of the CCP Tibetan Autonomous Regional Committee, the region's top authority.
Liang was assigned to the similar position in north China's Hebei province in December 2014.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Liang Tiangeng” is chinese politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Liang, Tiangeng and Chinese, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “chinese politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q8999290. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1960, 1976, 1979 and 1983.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Liang Tiangeng”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Liang Tiangeng primary sources, Liang Tiangeng archive and Liang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Liang Tiangeng”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Liang Tiangeng” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.