CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Lho La

mountain pass near Mount Everest

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ18011310
Source-derived summary

The Lho La (Chinese: 洛拉山坳) is a col on the border between Nepal and Tibet north of the Western Cwm, near Mount Everest. Situated low on the West Ridge of the mountain at a height of 6,006 metres (19,705 ft), it is not exactly a pass but more of a saddle on the Mt. Everest massif.

History and name

Local accounts suggest that before Khumbu was opened to Western mountaineers, the col served as a practical crossing point over the lowest section of Everest’s West Ridge. These describe trade routes between Nepal and Tibet linking Namche Bazaar and Tingri as well as routes used by local monks. Such claims rely on a period when Everest’s glaciers stood much higher than they do today, meaning that traversing the icefall and the col may have required less steep, technical climbing than in the present era.

For example Trulshik Rinpoche claimed Lho La was part of a trade route around 1800, but as the glaciers subsequently declined, the favoured route became the Nangpa La, to the west. However mountaineers expressed scepticism that a viable route existed that recently.

Klavs Becker-Larsen was told by local sherpas at the onset of his 1951 expedition that a monk had ascended Lho La to return to Rongbuk monastery and hence the route was viable, however Becker-Larsen had to abandon his subsequent attempt to climb Lho La half way due to the dangers of the route. The account of the monk may have been based on a historic traverse when the climb was more feasible.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Lho La” as mountain pass near Mount Everest. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1800, 1951—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where mountain, pass and Mount can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the places & architecture register because the source frames it as mountain pass near Mount Everest. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18011310. Authority coordinates are 28.010, 86.876. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1800 and 1951.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lho La”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lho La primary sources, Lho La archive and mountain research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lho La”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lho La” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.