CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Leszek Suski

Polish chemist, fencer (1930–2007)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ3830964
Source-derived summary

Leszek Suski (15 April 1930 – 19 April 2007) was a Polish fencer. He competed in the individual and team sabre events at the 1952 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

“Leszek Suski” enters the record as polish chemist, fencer (1930–2007). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Leszek, Suski and Polish can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1930, 2007, 1952—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1930-04-15. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Leszek, Suski and Polish.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Leszek Suski” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Leszek, Suski and Polish provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3830964. VIAF identifies the subject as 662176021910601500008. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1930, 2007 and 1952.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Leszek Suski”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Leszek Suski primary sources, Leszek Suski archive and Leszek research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Leszek Suski”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Leszek Suski” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.