CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Leslie T. Applegate House

United States historic place

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ65063346 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Leslie T. Applegate House, at 410 Maple St. in Falmouth, Kentucky, United States, was built in 1888. It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1983.

It is a Shingle Style house which was built for locally prominent lawyer Leslie T. Applegate. Its exterior has been restored to its original appearance. It was deemed to be the "best example of late 19th century residence on Maple Street (site of early Falmouth 'suburb') with integrity intact".

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Leslie T. Applegate House” as united States historic place. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Leslie, Applegate and House.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1888, 1983—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1888. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Leslie, Applegate and House providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Leslie T. Applegate House”, the useful work is to connect “united States historic place” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q65063346. Authority coordinates are 38.676, -84.333. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1888 and 1983.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Leslie T. Applegate House”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Leslie T. Applegate House primary sources, Leslie T. Applegate House archive and Leslie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Leslie T. Applegate House”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Leslie T. Applegate House” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.