Leslie J. Berg
American immunologist

Leslie Joan Berg is an American immunologist. As a professor at University of Massachusetts Medical School, she was elected the 95th president of the American Association of Immunologists for a one-year term from 2011 to 2012. Berg’s research focuses on understanding the signal transduction pathways—the succession of reactions inside the cell as it changes one kind of stimulus, or signal, into another—important for T-cell development and activation, and the generation of protective immunity to infections.
Early life
Berg earned her Bachelor of Arts degree at Harvard University and her PhD at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. She completed her postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford University School of Medicine.
Career
Berg joined the faculty at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in 1998. During her tenure, her research focuses on understanding the signal transduction pathways—the succession of reactions inside the cell as it changes one kind of stimulus, or signal, into another—important for T-cell development and activation, and the generation of protective immunity to infections. In 2011, Berg was elected the 95th president of the American Association of Immunologists (AAI) for a one-year term from 2011 to 2012. She also served as the first co-editor-in-chief of ImmunoHorizons with Michael S. Krangel and sat on AAI's Council from 2006 to 2013.
In 2018, Berg left the University of Massachusetts Medical School to chair the Department of Immunology and Microbiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Leslie J. Berg” as american immunologist. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as american immunologist. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 13, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q86488392. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011, 2012, 1998 and 2006.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Leslie J. Berg”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Leslie J. Berg primary sources, Leslie J. Berg archive and Leslie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Leslie J. Berg”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Leslie J. Berg” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.