CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Les Classiques des sciences sociales

free-access Quebec digital library

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2022
Entity authorityQ1820598 ↗
Source-derived summary

Les Classiques des sciences sociales (Social sciences classics) is a French digital library based in Saguenay, Quebec (Canada) offering HTML or pdf versions of works whose rights have either fallen into public domain or rightholders giving their consent. It is one of the most visited French library in the world, with about 28 million downloads since its opening in 2000.

The library went online in 2000 with the support of the Université du Québec à Chicoutimi although the teacher behind its creation had been digitizing social sciences texts for his undergraduate students since 1993. As of 2013 the open library gives access to roughly 5500 piece of works in French by 1400 writers coming mainly from France, Belgium, Switzerland and Quebec as well as French speaking Africa and Haiti.

Editorial summary

“Les Classiques des sciences sociales” enters the record as free-access Quebec digital library. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Classiques, sciences and sociales can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 1993, 2013, 1400—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1993. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Classiques, sciences and sociales.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Les Classiques des sciences sociales” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Classiques, sciences and sociales provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q1820598. VIAF identifies the subject as 182738706. None of the 4 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000, 1993, 2013 and 1400.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Les Classiques des sciences sociales”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Les Classiques des sciences sociales primary sources, Les Classiques des sciences sociales archive and Classiques research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Les Classiques des sciences sociales”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Les Classiques des sciences sociales” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.