CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Les Challenges de la Marche Verte

Moroccan series of one-day road cycling races

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 30, 2025
Entity authorityQ5973693 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Les Challenges de la Marche Verte is a series of One-day races held annually since 2010 in Morocco. It consists of three One-day races; GP Sakia El Hamra, GP Oued Eddahab and GP Al Massira, each rated 1.2 and is part of UCI Africa Tour.

Editorial summary

“Les Challenges de la Marche Verte” enters the record as moroccan series of one-day road cycling races. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Challenges, Marche and Verte can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2010. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Challenges, Marche and Verte.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Les Challenges de la Marche Verte” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Challenges, Marche and Verte provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 30, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5973693. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Les Challenges de la Marche Verte”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Les Challenges de la Marche Verte primary sources, Les Challenges de la Marche Verte archive and Challenges research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Les Challenges de la Marche Verte”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Les Challenges de la Marche Verte” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.