CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Leonor Curicuillor

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ113517579 ↗
Source-derived summary

Leonor Curicuillor (born c. 1513 - d. after 1536), was a princess of the Inca Empire.

She was the daughter of Inca Huáscar (r. 1527-1532). She is the subject of a love story which was described in the chronicle of Cabello de Balboa. She reportedly fell in love with Quilaco, an army captain in the army of her uncle prince Atahualpa. Her father did not approve of her choice because of the enmity between him and Atahualpa, Cuzco and Quito. The love story between her and Quilaco was discontinued and they were separated by the Incan civil war.

After this, the Spaniards arrived in the Inca Empire.

Editorial summary

“Leonor Curicuillor” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Leonor, Curicuillor and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1513, 1536, 1527, 1532—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Leonor, Curicuillor and Open-knowledge.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Leonor Curicuillor” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Leonor, Curicuillor and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q113517579. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1513, 1536, 1527 and 1532.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Leonor Curicuillor”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Leonor Curicuillor primary sources, Leonor Curicuillor archive and Leonor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Leonor Curicuillor”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Leonor Curicuillor” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.