CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Leo Feeney

Northern Irish cyclist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 22, 2025
Entity authorityQ136690246
Source-derived summary

Leo T. Feeney is a former racing cyclist from Northern Ireland, who represented Northern Ireland at the British Empire Games (now Commonwealth Games).

Biography

Feeney was a member of the Abbey Cycling Club of Belfast and won the 1955 championship of Ireland over 880 yards.

He represented the 1958 Northern Irish Team at the 1958 British Empire and Commonwealth Games in Cardiff, Wales, participating in three cycling program events; the time trial, the sprint and the scratch race.

Feeney won two titles at the Irish National Cycling Championships and participated at several world championship events.

Editorial summary

“Leo Feeney” enters the record as northern Irish cyclist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Feeney, Northern and Irish can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1955, 1958—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Feeney, Northern and Irish.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Leo Feeney” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Feeney, Northern and Irish provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 22, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q136690246. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1955 and 1958.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Leo Feeney”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Leo Feeney primary sources, Leo Feeney archive and Feeney research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Leo Feeney”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Leo Feeney” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.