Lemelson–MIT Prize
award
The Lemelson–MIT Program awards several prizes yearly to inventors in the United States. The largest is the Lemelson–MIT Prize which was endowed in 1994 by Jerome H. Lemelson, funded by the Lemelson Foundation, and is administered through the School of Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The winner receives $500,000, making it the largest cash prize for invention in the U.S.
The $100,000 Lemelson–MIT Award for Global Innovation (previously named the Award for Sustainability) was last awarded in 2013. The Award for Global Innovation replaced the $100,000 Lemelson–MIT Lifetime Achievement Award, which was awarded from 1995 to 2006. The Lifetime Achievement Award recognized outstanding individuals whose pioneering spirit and inventiveness throughout their careers improved society and inspired others.
The Lemelson–MIT Program also awards invention prizes for graduate students, called the Lemelson–MIT Student Prize.
List of Lemelson–MIT Prize winners
Source:
2019
Cody Friesen (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
2018
Luis von Ahn (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
2017
Feng Zhang (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
2016
Ramesh Raskar (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
2015
Jay Whitacre (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
2014
Sangeeta N. Bhatia (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
2013
Angela Belcher (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
Rebecca Richards-Kortum and Maria Oden (Lemelson–MIT Award for Global Innovation)
2012
Stephen Quake (Lemelson–MIT Prize) (Scientist, Inventor, Entrepreneur, Professor of Biophysics and Genomics at Stanford University)
Ashok Gadgil (Lemelson–MIT Award for Global Innovation)
2011
John A. Rogers (Lemelson–MIT Prize) (Professor, Physical Chemist, and Materials Scientist at Northwestern University)
Elizabeth Hausler (Lemelson–MIT Award for Sustainability)
2010
Carolyn Bertozzi (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
BP Agrawal (Lemelson–MIT Award for Sustainability)
2009
Chad Mirkin (Lemelson–MIT Prize), George B. Rathmann Professor of Chemistry, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Professor of Biomedical Engineering, and Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering, and Director of the International Institute for Nanotechnology and Center for Nanofabrication and Molecular Self-Assembly at Northwestern University
Joel Selanikio (Lemelson–MIT Award for Sustainability), CEO and co-founder, Magpi, and Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Hospital
2008
Joseph DeSimone (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
Martin Fisher (Lemelson–MIT Award for Sustainability)
2007
Timothy M. Swager (Lemelson–MIT Prize)
Lee Lynd (Lemelson–MIT Award for Sustainability)
2006
James Fergason (Lemelson–MIT Prize) for his liquid crystal display innovations.
Sidney Pestka (Lemelson–MIT Lifetime Achievement Award)
2005
Robert Dennard (Lemelson–MIT Lifetime Achievement Award)
2004
Nick Holonyak Jr. (Lemelson–MIT Prize) (John Bardeen Endowed Chair Emeritus in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Edith M. Flanigen (Lemelson–MIT Lifetime Achievement Award)
2003
Leroy Hood (Lemelson–MIT Prize) for his invention of four devices that have helped unlock the human genome, including the automated DNA sequencer.
William P. Murphy Jr.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lemelson–MIT Prize” is award. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lemelson, Prize and award, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “award” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q551250. The Library of Congress control number is no2006122867. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1994, 2013, 1995 and 2006.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lemelson–MIT Prize”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lemelson–MIT Prize primary sources, Lemelson–MIT Prize archive and Lemelson research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lemelson–MIT Prize”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lemelson–MIT Prize” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.