CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Leke baronets

extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of England

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2022
Entity authorityQ16991506
Source-derived summary

There have been two baronetcies created for members of the Leke family, both in the baronetage of England.

The baronetcy of Leke of Sutton was created on 22 May 1611 for Francis Leke, of Sutton, Nottinghamshire who was later advanced as Baron Deincourt in 1628 and Earl of Scarsdale in 1645.

The baronetcy of Leke of Newark-on-Trent was created on 15 December 1663 for Francis Leke, of Newark-on-Trent, Nottinghamshire. He was the Member of Parliament for Nottinghamshire 1666–79; the baronetcy became extinct on the death of his son, Sir Francis, the second Baronet, in 1681.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Leke baronets” is extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of England. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Leke, baronets and extinct, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1611, 1628, 1645, 1663—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Leke, baronets and extinct is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “extinct baronetcy in the Baronetage of England” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q16991506. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1611, 1628, 1645 and 1663.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Leke baronets”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Leke baronets primary sources, Leke baronets archive and Leke research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Leke baronets”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Leke baronets” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.