CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Legend of the Inca Bridge

1923 film by José A. Ferreyra

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 17, 2023
Entity authorityQ12155725 ↗
Source-derived summary

Leyenda del puente inca (English language: Legend of the Inca Bridge) is a 1923 silent Argentine film directed and written by José A. Ferreyra. The film premiered in November 1923 in Buenos Aires.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Legend of the Inca Bridge” is 1923 film by José A. Ferreyra. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Legend, Inca and Bridge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1923—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1923-01-01. For this dossier, Legend, Inca and Bridge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “1923 film by José A. Ferreyra” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 17, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q12155725. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1923.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Legend of the Inca Bridge”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Legend of the Inca Bridge primary sources, Legend of the Inca Bridge archive and Legend research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Legend of the Inca Bridge”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Legend of the Inca Bridge” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.