CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lee Chae-won

South Korean cross-country skier

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ498191
Source-derived summary

Lee Chae-won (Korean: 이채원; formerly Lee Chun-ja; born 7 April 1981) is a South Korean cross country skier who has competed since 1999. Competing in six Winter Olympics, she earned her best finish of 21st in the team sprint event at PyeongChang in 2018.

She was born in Pyeongchang County, Gangwon Province, South Korea.

Lee's best finish at the FIS Nordic World Ski Championships was 49th in the 10 km event at Oberstdorf in 2005.

Her best World Cup finish was 15th in a relay event in Sweden in 2008 while her best individual finish was 43rd in a 15 km mass start event at France that same year.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Lee Chae-won” as south Korean cross-country skier. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chae-won, South and Korean.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981, 1999, 2018, 2005—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1981-04-07. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chae-won, South and Korean providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Lee Chae-won”, the useful work is to connect “south Korean cross-country skier” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q498191. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1981, 1999, 2018 and 2005.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lee Chae-won”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lee Chae-won primary sources, Lee Chae-won archive and Chae-won research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lee Chae-won”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lee Chae-won” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.