CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Sarisophora dispila

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 5, 2024
Entity authorityQ14311460 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sarisophora dispila is a moth in the family Lecithoceridae. It was described by Alfred Jefferis Turner in 1919. It is found in Australia, where it has been recorded from the Northern Territory.

The wingspan is about 11 mm. The forewings are fuscous. The stigmata are dark fuscous, the first discal large and round and found at one-third, the second discal similar, found before two-thirds, the plical minute and found beneath the first discal. The hindwings are pale grey.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Sarisophora dispila” as species of insect. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Sarisophora, dispila and species.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1919—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Sarisophora, dispila and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Sarisophora dispila”, the useful work is to connect “species of insect” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 5, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q14311460. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1919.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sarisophora dispila”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sarisophora dispila primary sources, Sarisophora dispila archive and Sarisophora research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sarisophora dispila”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sarisophora dispila” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.