India–Lebanon relations
bilateral relations between India and Lebanon
The Lebanese Republic and the Republic of India established diplomatic relations in 1954. Lebanon maintains an embassy in New Delhi, while India maintains one in Beirut.
Modern Relations
The fact that India kept its embassy in Beirut open and functioning throughout the Lebanese civil war from 1975 to 1990 (closing very briefly from 5 August to 16 October 1989), in contrast to the embassies of a large number of other countries, was greatly appreciated by Lebanon. Indian Battalion (INDBATT) have been deployed in the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) since November 1998. INDBATT maintains 12 positions in its 107.6 km square AOR, which is divided into four parts. The UN troops complement but do not take over the tasks of Lebanon’s own army and police.
Both countries have co-operated closely on various issues of mutual interest during their overlap in 2010 as non-permanent members of the UN Security Council.
Trade Relations
While the trade volume between the two countries has historically been relatively modest, there is recognition of the untapped opportunities that exist for deeper economic engagement. Both nations have expressed a desire to expand bilateral trade.
Total volume of trade between India and Lebanon during Jan-Sept 2017 was $181 million.
The public source identifies “India–Lebanon relations” as bilateral relations between India and Lebanon. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around India, Lebanon and relations.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “India–Lebanon relations”, the useful work is to connect “bilateral relations between India and Lebanon” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15948958. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1954, 1975, 1990 and 1989.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “India–Lebanon relations”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow India–Lebanon relations primary sources, India–Lebanon relations archive and India research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “India–Lebanon relations”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “India–Lebanon relations” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.