Acacia aphylla
species of plant
Acacia aphylla, commonly known as leafless rock wattle, is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae and is endemic to an area around Perth in Western Australia. It is a widely branched shrub with glaucous, sharply-pointed branchlets, flowers arranged in spherical light golden heads, and leathery, linear pods.
Description
Acacia aphylla is widely branched, spiny, glaucous, glabrous shrub that grows to a height of 0.9–3 m (2 ft 11 in – 9 ft 10 in) and has no leaves or phyllodes. The flowers are borne in spherical heads of 20 to 30 on a peduncle 7–10 mm (0.28–0.39 in) wide, and are bright, light golden. Flowering occurs from August to October, and the fruit is a leathery, linear pod 30–90 mm (1.2–3.5 in) long and 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) wide containing seeds that are oblong, 4.0–4.5 mm (0.16–0.18 in) long.
Taxonomy
Acacia aphylla was first formally described in 1974 by the botanist Bruce Maslin in the journal Nuytsia from specimens he collected downstream from Mundaring Weir in 1970. The specific epithet (aphylla) alludes to the lack of phyllodes, a characteristic of the species.
Distribution and habitat
Leafless rock wattle has a restricted range and is only found in two areas in the Darling Range about 60 kilometres (37 mi) apart from each other. The areas are both to the east of Perth with one population being found in Hidden Valley area in the Helena River and the other south of Northam in the Clackline Nature Reserve. The species is commonly found in open forest communities that are dominated by Eucalyptus marginata and Eucalyptus calophylla, or in woodlands where Eucalyptus loxophleba dominates.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Acacia aphylla” is species of plant. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Acacia, aphylla and species, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “species of plant” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2700839. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1974 and 1970.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Acacia aphylla”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Acacia aphylla primary sources, Acacia aphylla archive and Acacia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Acacia aphylla”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Acacia aphylla” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.