2-category
Generalization of category

In category theory in mathematics, a 2-category is a category with "morphisms between morphisms", called 2-morphisms. A basic example is the category Cat of all (small) categories, where a 2-morphism is a natural transformation between functors.
The concept of a strict 2-category was first introduced by Charles Ehresmann in his work on enriched categories in 1965. The more general concept of bicategory (or weak 2-category), where composition of morphisms is associative only up to a 2-isomorphism, was introduced in 1967 by Jean Bénabou.
A (2, 1)-category is a 2-category where each 2-morphism is invertible.
Definitions
A strict 2-category
By definition, a strict 2-category C consists of the data:
a class of 0-cells,
for each pairs of 0-cells
a
,
b
{\displaystyle a,b}
, a set
Hom
(
a
,
b
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Hom} (a,b)}
called the set of 1-cells from
a
{\displaystyle a}
to
b
{\displaystyle b}
,
for each pairs of 1-cells
f
,
g
{\displaystyle f,g}
in the same hom-set, a set
2Mor
(
f
,
g
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {2Mor} (f,g)}
called the set of 2-cells from
f
{\displaystyle f}
to
g
{\displaystyle g}
,
ordinary compositions: maps
∘
:
Hom
(
b
,
c
)
×
Hom
(
a
,
b
)
→
Hom
(
a
,
c
)
{\displaystyle \circ :\operatorname {Hom} (b,c)\times \operatorname {Hom} (a,b)\to \operatorname {Hom} (a,c)}
,
vertical compositions: maps
∘
:
2Mor
(
g
,
h
)
×
2Mor
(
f
,
g
)
→
2Mor
(
f
,
h
)
{\displaystyle \circ :\operatorname {2Mor} (g,h)\times \operatorname {2Mor} (f,g)\to \operatorname {2Mor} (f,h)}
, where
f
,
g
,
h
{\displaystyle f,g,h}
are in the same hom-set,
horizontal compositions: maps
∗
:
2Mor
(
u
,
v
)
×
2Mor
(
f
,
g
)
→
2Mor
(
u
∘
f
,
v
∘
g
)
{\displaystyle *:\operatorname {2Mor} (u,v)\times \operatorname {2Mor} (f,g)\to \operatorname {2Mor} (u\circ f,v\circ g)}
for
f
,
g
:
a
→
b
{\displaystyle f,g:a\to b}
and
u
,
v
:
b
→
c
{\displaystyle u,v:b\to c}
that are subject to the following conditions
the 0-cells with 1-cells between them form a category under ordinary composition,
for each 0-cells
a
{\displaystyle a}
and
b
{\displaystyle b}
, the 1-cells from
a
{\displaystyle a}
to
b
{\displaystyle b}
with 2-cells between them form a category under vertical composition,
the 0-cells with 2-cells between 1-cells between them form a category under horizontal composition; namely, an object is a 0-cell and the hom-set from
a
{\displaystyle a}
to
b
{\displaystyle b}
is the set of all 2-cells of the form
α
:
f
⇒
g
{\displaystyle \alpha :f\Rightarrow g}
for some
f
,
g
:
a
→
b
{\displaystyle f,g:a\to b}
,
the interchange law:
(
δ
∗
β
)
∘
(
γ
∗
α
)
{\displaystyle (\delta *\beta )\circ (\gamma *\alpha )}
, when defined, is the same as
(
δ
∘
γ
)
∗
(
β
∘
α
)
{\displaystyle (\delta \circ \gamma )*(\beta \circ \alpha )}
.
The 0-cells, 1-cells, and 2-cells terminology is replaced by 0-morphisms, 1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms in some sources (see also Higher category theory). Vertical compositions and horizontal compositions are also written as
∘
1
,
∘
0
{\displaystyle \circ _{1},\circ _{0}}
.
The interchange law can be drawn as a pasting diagram as follows:
Here the left-hand diagram denotes the vertical composition of horizontal composites, the right-hand diagram denotes the horizontal composition of vertical composites, and the diagram in the centre is the customary representation of both. The 2-cell are drawn with double arrows ⇒, the 1-cell with single arrows →, and the 0-cell with points.
The public source identifies “2-category” as generalization of category. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around 2-category, Generalization and category.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2-category”, the useful work is to connect “generalization of category” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4596935. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1965 and 1967.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2-category”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2-category primary sources, 2-category archive and 2-category research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2-category”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2-category” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.