CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2-category

Generalization of category

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ4596935 ↗
Source-derived summary

In category theory in mathematics, a 2-category is a category with "morphisms between morphisms", called 2-morphisms. A basic example is the category Cat of all (small) categories, where a 2-morphism is a natural transformation between functors.

The concept of a strict 2-category was first introduced by Charles Ehresmann in his work on enriched categories in 1965. The more general concept of bicategory (or weak 2-category), where composition of morphisms is associative only up to a 2-isomorphism, was introduced in 1967 by Jean Bénabou.

A (2, 1)-category is a 2-category where each 2-morphism is invertible.

Definitions

A strict 2-category

By definition, a strict 2-category C consists of the data:

a class of 0-cells,

for each pairs of 0-cells

a

,

b

{\displaystyle a,b}

, a set

Hom

⁡

(

a

,

b

)

{\displaystyle \operatorname {Hom} (a,b)}

called the set of 1-cells from

a

{\displaystyle a}

to

b

{\displaystyle b}

,

for each pairs of 1-cells

f

,

g

{\displaystyle f,g}

in the same hom-set, a set

2Mor

⁡

(

f

,

g

)

{\displaystyle \operatorname {2Mor} (f,g)}

called the set of 2-cells from

f

{\displaystyle f}

to

g

{\displaystyle g}

,

ordinary compositions: maps

∘

:

Hom

⁡

(

b

,

c

)

×

Hom

⁡

(

a

,

b

)

→

Hom

⁡

(

a

,

c

)

{\displaystyle \circ :\operatorname {Hom} (b,c)\times \operatorname {Hom} (a,b)\to \operatorname {Hom} (a,c)}

,

vertical compositions: maps

∘

:

2Mor

⁡

(

g

,

h

)

×

2Mor

⁡

(

f

,

g

)

→

2Mor

⁡

(

f

,

h

)

{\displaystyle \circ :\operatorname {2Mor} (g,h)\times \operatorname {2Mor} (f,g)\to \operatorname {2Mor} (f,h)}

, where

f

,

g

,

h

{\displaystyle f,g,h}

are in the same hom-set,

horizontal compositions: maps

∗

:

2Mor

⁡

(

u

,

v

)

×

2Mor

⁡

(

f

,

g

)

→

2Mor

⁡

(

u

∘

f

,

v

∘

g

)

{\displaystyle *:\operatorname {2Mor} (u,v)\times \operatorname {2Mor} (f,g)\to \operatorname {2Mor} (u\circ f,v\circ g)}

for

f

,

g

:

a

→

b

{\displaystyle f,g:a\to b}

and

u

,

v

:

b

→

c

{\displaystyle u,v:b\to c}

that are subject to the following conditions

the 0-cells with 1-cells between them form a category under ordinary composition,

for each 0-cells

a

{\displaystyle a}

and

b

{\displaystyle b}

, the 1-cells from

a

{\displaystyle a}

to

b

{\displaystyle b}

with 2-cells between them form a category under vertical composition,

the 0-cells with 2-cells between 1-cells between them form a category under horizontal composition; namely, an object is a 0-cell and the hom-set from

a

{\displaystyle a}

to

b

{\displaystyle b}

is the set of all 2-cells of the form

α

:

f

⇒

g

{\displaystyle \alpha :f\Rightarrow g}

for some

f

,

g

:

a

→

b

{\displaystyle f,g:a\to b}

,

the interchange law:

(

δ

∗

β

)

∘

(

γ

∗

α

)

{\displaystyle (\delta *\beta )\circ (\gamma *\alpha )}

, when defined, is the same as

(

δ

∘

γ

)

∗

(

β

∘

α

)

{\displaystyle (\delta \circ \gamma )*(\beta \circ \alpha )}

.

The 0-cells, 1-cells, and 2-cells terminology is replaced by 0-morphisms, 1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms in some sources (see also Higher category theory). Vertical compositions and horizontal compositions are also written as

∘

1

,

∘

0

{\displaystyle \circ _{1},\circ _{0}}

.

The interchange law can be drawn as a pasting diagram as follows:

Here the left-hand diagram denotes the vertical composition of horizontal composites, the right-hand diagram denotes the horizontal composition of vertical composites, and the diagram in the centre is the customary representation of both. The 2-cell are drawn with double arrows ⇒, the 1-cell with single arrows →, and the 0-cell with points.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2-category” as generalization of category. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around 2-category, Generalization and category.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1965, 1967—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with 2-category, Generalization and category providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2-category”, the useful work is to connect “generalization of category” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4596935. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1965 and 1967.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2-category”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2-category primary sources, 2-category archive and 2-category research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2-category”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2-category” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.