CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Lawn bowls at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Mixed pairs B2–3

bowls event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ113630187 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lawn bowls Mixed pairs B2–3 at the 2022 Commonwealth Games was held at the Victoria Park from July 31 to August 5. A total of 12 athletes from 6 associations participated in the event. Scotland's Melanie Inness and George Miller won the gold medal, defeating Julie Thomas and Gordon LLewellyn of Wales in the final. Alison Yearling and Chris Turnbull from England won the bronze medal.

Sectional play

The top four advance to the knockout stage.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lawn bowls at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Mixed pairs B2–3” is bowls event. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lawn, bowls and Commonwealth, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Lawn, bowls and Commonwealth is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “bowls event” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q113630187. The first chronological checks are 2022.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lawn bowls at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Mixed pairs B2–3”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lawn bowls at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Mixed pairs B2–3 primary sources, Lawn bowls at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Mixed pairs B2–3 archive and Lawn research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lawn bowls at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Mixed pairs B2–3”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lawn bowls at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Mixed pairs B2–3” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.