CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line

Regional metric gauge railway line

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ3239136 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line is a railway line in the canton of Vaud in Switzerland. The line connects the city of Lausanne with Bercher via Echallens. It is owned and operated by the Chemin de fer Lausanne-Échallens-Bercher (LEB) company, which was the result of a merger of the separate Chemin de fer Lausanne-Échallens (LE) and Compagnie du Central Vaudois. It is under the operational management of Transports publics de la région lausannoise.

The line is notable as it was the first metre gauge railway to built in Switzerland, in 1873, and the forerunner of many later such lines.

History

The initial line

In 1860, an abortive plan was put forward for a standard gauge railway from Lausanne to Payerne via Cheseaux-sur-Lausanne, Échallens, Bercher and Demoret. In 1871, an application was made for a concession to build a line from Lausanne to Échallens using a monorail system designed by Jean Larmanjat. The following year, the concession was granted to the Lausanne-Échallens company on the condition that the line should be built as a conventional two-rail railway.

The line was the first metre gauge railway to be built in Switzerland. It was built using equipment from the temporary Mont Cenis Pass Railway that crossed the Mont Cenis Pass between France and Italy until the opening of the Mont Cenis Tunnel in 1871.

Editorial summary

“Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line” enters the record as regional metric gauge railway line. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Lausanne, Échallens and Bercher can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1873, 1860, 1871—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Lausanne, Échallens and Bercher.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Lausanne, Échallens and Bercher provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3239136. Authority coordinates are 46.639, 6.633. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1873, 1860 and 1871.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line primary sources, Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line archive and Lausanne research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lausanne–Échallens–Bercher line” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.