CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Laura Lundy

researcher (ORCID 0000-0003-1994-4290)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ90791005
Source-derived summary

Laura Lundy is Professor of Children's Rights at Queen's University Belfast and Professor of Law at University College Cork. Lundy is also Co-Director of the Centre for Children's Rights, located at Queens University Belfast in Belfast.

Career, research and impact

Alongside being a professor, a trained barrister at law, Co-Director of the Centre for Children's Rights, Lundy is also joint Editor in Chief of the International Journal of Children's Rights. Her research specialises in children's education rights, rights to participate in decision-making, and the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

Lundy's article on "'Voice' is not enough", published in 2007, is one of the most highly cited articles ever on children's rights and the model of children's participation is presents is used extensively both in practice and within scholarship.

Notable publications

"Incorporation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in Law: A Comparative Review", International Journal of Children's Rights, 21 (3), 2013: 442-463.

"'Voice' is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child". British Educational Research Journal. 33 (6), 2007: 927–942.

"Children's rights and educational policy in Europe: the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child".

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Laura Lundy” is researcher (ORCID 0000-0003-1994-4290). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Laura, Lundy and researcher, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Laura, Lundy and researcher is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “researcher (ORCID 0000-0003-1994-4290)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q90791005. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007 and 2013.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Laura Lundy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Laura Lundy primary sources, Laura Lundy archive and Laura research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Laura Lundy”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Laura Lundy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.