Latimer–MacDuffee theorem
Theorem in abstract algebra

The Latimer–MacDuffee theorem is a theorem in abstract algebra, a branch of mathematics.
It is named after Claiborne Latimer and Cyrus Colton MacDuffee, who published it in 1933. Significant contributions to its theory were made later by Olga Taussky-Todd.
Let
f
{\displaystyle f}
be a monic, irreducible polynomial of degree
n
{\displaystyle n}
. The Latimer–MacDuffee theorem gives a one-to-one correspondence between
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
-similarity classes of
n
×
n
{\displaystyle n\times n}
matrices with characteristic polynomial
f
{\displaystyle f}
and the ideal classes in the order
Z
[
x
]
/
(
f
(
x
)
)
.
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [x]/(f(x)).}
where ideals are considered equivalent if they are equal up to an overall (nonzero) rational scalar multiple. (Note that this order need not be the full ring of integers, so nonzero ideals need not be invertible.) Since an order in a number field has only finitely many ideal classes (even if it is not the maximal order, and we mean here ideals classes for all nonzero ideals, not just the invertible ones), it follows that there are only finitely many conjugacy classes of matrices over the integers with characteristic polynomial
f
(
x
)
{\displaystyle f(x)}
.
The public source identifies “Latimer–MacDuffee theorem” as theorem in abstract algebra. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Latimer, MacDuffee and theorem.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Latimer–MacDuffee theorem”, the useful work is to connect “theorem in abstract algebra” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 28, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q6496164. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1933.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Latimer–MacDuffee theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Latimer–MacDuffee theorem primary sources, Latimer–MacDuffee theorem archive and Latimer research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Latimer–MacDuffee theorem”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Latimer–MacDuffee theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.