The Three Rats (film)
1946 film by Carlos Schlieper

The Three Rats (Spanish:Las Tres Ratas) is a 1946 Argentine drama film of the classical era of Argentine cinema, directed by Carlos Schlieper and starring Mecha Ortiz, Amelia Bence and María Duval. It is an adaptation of Alfredo Pareja Diezcanseco's 1944 novel of the same title.
Cast
Mecha Ortiz as Mercedes de la Fuente
Amelia Bence as Eugenia de la Fuente
María Duval as Ana Luisa de la Fuente
Miguel Faust Rocha as Alfredo Millán
Santiago Gómez Cou as Ernesto Carbó
Ricardo Passano as Oscar Aranda
Felisa Mary as Aurora de la Fuente
Floren Delbene as Carlos
Amalia Sánchez Ariño as Consuelo
Juan José Piñeyro as Zabala
Lalo Bouhier as Inspector de policía
Aurelia Ferrer as Bernarda
Cirilo Etulain as Horacio Saldaña
Gonzalo Palomero as Capataz
Jorge Villoldo as Mozo
Jorge Eamboez as Amigo
Nélida Romero as Modista 1
Soledad Marcó as Modista 2
Marcelo Lavalle as Muchacho
Estela Vidal as Mucama
Francisco Audenino
References
Bibliography
Plazaola, Luis Trelles. South American Cinema. La Editorial, UPR, 1989.
The public source identifies “The Three Rats (film)” as 1946 film by Carlos Schlieper. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Three, Rats and film.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “The Three Rats (film)”, the useful work is to connect “1946 film by Carlos Schlieper” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5971352. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1946, 1944 and 1989.
Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “The Three Rats (film)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow The Three Rats (film) primary sources, The Three Rats (film) archive and Three research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Three Rats (film)”?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “The Three Rats (film)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.