Mono Grande
mythical South American ape

The Mono Grande (Spanish for "Large Monkey"), a large monkey-like creature, has been occasionally reported in South America. Such creatures are reported as being much larger than the commonly accepted New World monkeys. These accounts have received rather little publicity, and typically generated little or no interest from experts.
Older reports and sightings
The German naturalist Alexander von Humboldt, who travelled in South America during early 19th century, heard stories from Orinoco about furry human-like creatures called Salvaje ("Wild"), which were rumoured to capture women, build huts and to occasionally eat human flesh. He attached no belief to the myth. The naturalist Philip Gosse also tried to examine these legends during his travels in Venezuela during the mid-19th century, but with no real success (Sjögren (1980)).
Modern reports and sightings
The so-called De Loys's ape was photographed by Swiss geologist Francois de Loys in 1920 and proposed as a possible unknown great ape of South America; it has since been identified as almost certainly a spider monkey, after being first debunked by Sir Arthur Keith (1929).
In the 1940s, American scientist Philip Herschkowitz traveled in the same areas as de Loys, and concluded that the story was a myth whose origin was the spider monkey, Ateles belzebuth. However, in 1951, a Frenchman named Roger Courteville claimed to have seen an apeman at the same Tarra River where de Loys said he had seen his creatures. Like de Loys, he presented a photograph of the creature as evidence, though he was accused of perpetrating a hoax with a manipulated photograph (based on Loys photograph).
“Mono Grande” enters the record as mythical South American ape. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Mono, Grande and mythical can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Mono Grande” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Mono, Grande and mythical provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11344444. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1980, 1920, 1929 and 1951.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Mono Grande”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Mono Grande primary sources, Mono Grande archive and Mono research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mono Grande”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Mono Grande” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.