CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Corymbia grandifolia

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ15396601 ↗
Source-derived summary

Corymbia grandifolia, commonly known as cabbage gum, large-leaved cabbage gum and paper-fruited bloodwood, is a species of tree that is endemic to northern Australia. It has smooth bark, egg-shaped to broadly elliptic to lance-shaped adult leaves, flowers buds in groups of three or seven, creamy white flowers and cup-shaped to cylindrical fruit.

Description

Corymbia grandifolia is a tree that typically grows to a height of 3–15 m (9.8–49.2 ft) and forms a lignotuber. It has smooth white to pale grey bark that is shed in thin flakes. Young plants and coppice regrowth have egg-shaped to broadly lance-shaped leaves that are 130–170 mm (5.1–6.7 in) long, 110–140 mm (4.3–5.5 in) wide and petiolate. Adult leaves are the same shade of glossy green on both sides, egg-shaped to broadly elliptic to lance-shaped, 80–200 mm (3.1–7.9 in) long and 30–85 mm (1.2–3.3 in) wide on a petiole 5–16 mm (0.20–0.63 in) long. The tree loses its leaves in the dry season. The flower buds are arranged in leaf axils on the leafless branchlets, on a branched peduncle up to 2 mm (0.079 in) long, each branch of the peduncle with three or seven buds on pedicels 8–27 mm (0.31–1.06 in) long. Mature buds are pear-shaped, 10–12 mm (0.39–0.47 in) long and 7–9 mm (0.28–0.35 in) wide with a rounded operculum that sometimes has a central point or knob. Flowering occurs from September to January and the flowers are creamy white.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Corymbia grandifolia” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Corymbia, grandifolia and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 237-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Corymbia, grandifolia and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Corymbia grandifolia”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15396601. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Corymbia grandifolia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Corymbia grandifolia primary sources, Corymbia grandifolia archive and Corymbia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Corymbia grandifolia”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Corymbia grandifolia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.