CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lao Development Association

political party originally known as the Southern Bloc

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 2, 2024
Entity authorityQ25313426
Source-derived summary

The Lao Development Association was a political party in Laos.

History

The party began as the Southern Bloc, a conservative group led by Leuam Insisiengmai and Boun Oum, and won 15 seats in the 1965 elections, emerging as the largest party. Once in parliament, it formed the core of the Group of Thirty-Three.

The Group of Thirty-Three helped vote down the 1966 budget, leading to early elections in 1967. Following the elections the party was renamed the Lao Development Association. It was heavily defeated in the 1972 elections.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lao Development Association” is political party originally known as the Southern Bloc. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Development, Association and political, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1965, 1966, 1967, 1972—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Development, Association and political is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “political party originally known as the Southern Bloc” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 2, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q25313426. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1965, 1966, 1967 and 1972.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lao Development Association”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lao Development Association primary sources, Lao Development Association archive and Development research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lao Development Association”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lao Development Association” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.