CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779)

military conflict

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ111648747 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lao–Siamese War or the Siamese Invasion of Laos (1778–1779) was a military conflict between Thonburi Kingdom and the Lao kingdoms of Vientiane and Champasak. The war resulted in all three Lao kingdoms of Luang Phrabang, Vientiane and Champasak becoming Siamese tributary vassal kingdoms under Siamese suzerainty and domination in Thonburi and the subsequent Rattanakosin Period.

Background

Vientiane–Luang Phrabang Rivalry

Succession disputes after the reign of King Sourigna Vongsa of Lanxang resulted in the fragmentation of the Lao kingdom of Lanxang into three distinct kingdoms of Luang Phrabang, Vientiane and Champasak in the early eighteenth century. In 1763, the Burmese armies under the new Konbaung dynasty invaded and captured Chiangmai and Lanna. The Burmese occupation of Lanna allowed the Burmese to expand its influences into Laos. In 1764, King Ong Boun of Vientiane sought alliance with the Burmese to invade his rival Luang Phrabang. The Burmese general Nemyo Thihapate led the Burmese army to attack the city of Luang Phrabang as a part of his campaign to conquer Ayutthaya. King Sotikakumman of Luang Phrabang defended his city but the Burmese shelled heavily. According to Burmese chronicles, the Burmese had the severed heads of Lao captives piled up into large collection of human heads to demoralize the Lao defenders. Luang Phrabang fell to the Burmese in March 1765.

Editorial summary

“Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779)” enters the record as military conflict. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Siamese, military and conflict can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1778, 1779, 1763, 1764—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Siamese, military and conflict.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Siamese, military and conflict provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q111648747. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1778, 1779, 1763 and 1764.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779) primary sources, Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779) archive and Siamese research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lao–Siamese War (1778–1779)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.