CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Landry Office, New Brunswick

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ131685905 ↗
Source-derived summary

Landry Office is an unincorporated place in New Brunswick, Canada. It is recognized as a designated place by Statistics Canada.

Demographics

In the 2021 Census of Population conducted by Statistics Canada, Landry Office had a population of 403 living in 178 of its 215 total private dwellings, a change of −3.4% from its 2016 population of 417. With a land area of 37.75 km2 (14.58 sq mi), it had a population density of 10.7/km2 (27.6/sq mi) in 2021.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Landry Office, New Brunswick” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Landry, Office and Brunswick.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Landry, Office and Brunswick providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Landry Office, New Brunswick”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131685905. Authority coordinates are 47.670, -64.940. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021 and 2016.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Landry Office, New Brunswick”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Landry Office, New Brunswick primary sources, Landry Office, New Brunswick archive and Landry research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Landry Office, New Brunswick”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Landry Office, New Brunswick” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.