CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Lamont A. Stevens

American politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ18738996 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lamont A. Stevens was an American politician from Maine. Stevens, a Democrat from Wells, Maine, served in the Maine House of Representatives for one term (1883-1884). He also served a single term as the 2nd Maine State Auditor from 1911 to 1913. He was the Democratic Party's candidate for Maine's 1st congressional district in September 1916, which he lost to Louis B. Goodall of Sanford.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Lamont A. Stevens” as american politician. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Lamont, Stevens and American.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1883, 1884, 1911, 1913—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1849-06-12. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Lamont, Stevens and American providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Lamont A. Stevens”, the useful work is to connect “american politician” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18738996. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1883, 1884, 1911 and 1913.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lamont A. Stevens”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lamont A. Stevens primary sources, Lamont A. Stevens archive and Lamont research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lamont A. Stevens”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lamont A. Stevens” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.