CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Lam Po Kuen

Hong Kong tennis player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 19, 2025
Entity authorityQ108597247 ↗
Source-derived summary

Polly Lam Po Kuen (born 20 April 1982) is a Hong Kong former professional tennis player.

Lam competed for the Hong Kong Fed Cup team between 1999 and 2010, appearing in a total of 32 rubbers across 24 ties, for five singles and seven doubles wins. She was also a Hong Kong representative at the All-China Games, East Asian Games, 2005 Summer Universiade and 2006 Asian Games.

On the professional tour, Lam featured at ITF circuit level and reached a best singles ranking of 655 in the world.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lam Po Kuen” is hong Kong tennis player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Kuen, Hong and Kong, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1982, 1999, 2010, 2005—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1982-04-20. For this dossier, Kuen, Hong and Kong is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “hong Kong tennis player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 19, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q108597247. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1982, 1999, 2010 and 2005.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lam Po Kuen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lam Po Kuen primary sources, Lam Po Kuen archive and Kuen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lam Po Kuen”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lam Po Kuen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.