Lalachus
Spanish actress
Laura Yustres Vélez (born 21 April 1990 in Fuenlabrada), better known by her stage name Lalachus or occasionally LaLaChus, is a Spanish TV comedian and actress.
Career
After graduating in communications, she worked for a decade as a receptionist for a construction firm before entering the world of entertainment. She started her comedy career in 2018 with a show titled Riot Comedy, but came to greater prominence in 2020 with her social media content.
As an actress, in 2020 she played the role of tabloid journalist Lydia Lozano in the series Veneno about the life of TV personality La Veneno.
In 2022, she appeared on Tu cara me suena with her co-presenter Eva Soriano as Sonia & Selena.
In 2023, she appeared in the documentary Influencers: sobrevivir a las redes. She also became a regular collaborator on David Broncano's La Resistencia on #0.
In 2024, she followed Broncano to become a regular collaborator on his successful chat show La revuelta. On 5 December 2024, it was announced that she would present the Twelve Grapes on La 1 with Broncano. The show won the ratings battle between La 1 and Antena 3 with a convincing peak of 33.1%, though it was subject to controversy in more conservative circles when she held up a picture of Jesus with the head of the bull mascot of TVE game show El Grand Prix del verano photoshopped onto it.
The public source identifies “Lalachus” as spanish actress. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Lalachus, Spanish and actress.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Lalachus”, the useful work is to connect “spanish actress” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131007731. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1990, 2018, 2020 and 2022.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lalachus”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lalachus primary sources, Lalachus archive and Lalachus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lalachus”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lalachus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.