CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sylvester's formula

Formula in matrix theory

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ7660748 ↗
Source-derived summary

In matrix theory, Sylvester's formula or Sylvester's matrix theorem (named after J. J. Sylvester) or Lagrange−Sylvester interpolation expresses an analytic function f (A) of a matrix A as a polynomial in A, in terms of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A. It states that

f

(

A

)

=

∑

i

=

1

k

f

(

λ

i

)

A

i

,

{\displaystyle f(A)=\sum _{i=1}^{k}f(\lambda _{i})~A_{i}~,}

where the λi are the eigenvalues of A, and the matrices

A

i

≡

∏

j

=

1

j

≠

i

k

1

λ

i

−

λ

j

(

A

−

λ

j

I

)

{\displaystyle A_{i}\equiv \prod _{j=1 \atop j\neq i}^{k}{\frac {1}{\lambda _{i}-\lambda _{j}}}\left(A-\lambda _{j}I\right)}

are the corresponding Frobenius covariants of A, which are (projection) matrix Lagrange polynomials of A.

Conditions

Sylvester's formula applies for any diagonalizable matrix A with k distinct eigenvalues, λ1, ..., λk, and any function f defined on some subset of the complex numbers such that f(A) is well defined. The last condition means that every eigenvalue λi is in the domain of f, and that every eigenvalue λi with multiplicity mi > 1 is in the interior of the domain, with f being (mi - 1) times differentiable at λi.

Example

Consider the two-by-two matrix:

A

=

[

1

3

4

2

]

.

{\displaystyle A={\begin{bmatrix}1&3\\4&2\end{bmatrix}}.}

This matrix has two eigenvalues, 5 and −2. Its Frobenius covariants are

A

1

=

c

1

r

1

=

[

3

4

]

[

1

7

1

7

]

=

[

3

7

3

7

4

7

4

7

]

=

A

+

2

I

5

−

(

−

2

)

A

2

=

c

2

r

2

=

[

1

7

−

1

7

]

[

4

−

3

]

=

[

4

7

−

3

7

−

4

7

3

7

]

=

A

−

5

I

−

2

−

5

.

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}A_{1}&=c_{1}r_{1}={\begin{bmatrix}3\\4\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {1}{7}}&{\frac {1}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {3}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\\{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {4}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\frac {A+2I}{5-(-2)}}\\A_{2}&=c_{2}r_{2}={\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {1}{7}}\\-{\frac {1}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}4&-3\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {4}{7}}&-{\frac {3}{7}}\\-{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\frac {A-5I}{-2-5}}.\end{aligned}}}

Sylvester's formula then amounts to

f

(

A

)

=

f

(

5

)

A

1

+

f

(

−

2

)

A

2

.

{\displaystyle f(A)=f(5)A_{1}+f(-2)A_{2}.\,}

For instance, if f is defined by f(x) = x−1, then Sylvester's formula expresses the matrix inverse f(A) = A−1 as

1

5

[

3

7

3

7

4

7

4

7

]

−

1

2

[

4

7

−

3

7

−

4

7

3

7

]

=

[

−

0.2

0.3

0.4

−

0.1

]

.

{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{5}}{\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {3}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\\{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {4}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}-{\frac {1}{2}}{\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {4}{7}}&-{\frac {3}{7}}\\-{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}-0.2&0.3\\0.4&-0.1\end{bmatrix}}.}

Generalization

Sylvester's formula is only valid for matrices with no repeated eigenvalues; an extension due to Arthur Buchheim, based on Hermite interpolating polynomials, covers the general case:

f

(

A

)

=

∑

i

=

1

s

[

∑

j

=

0

n

i

−

1

1

j

!

ϕ

i

(

j

)

(

λ

i

)

(

A

−

λ

i

I

)

j

∏

j

=

1

,

j

≠

i

s

(

A

−

λ

j

I

)

n

j

]

{\displaystyle f(A)=\sum _{i=1}^{s}\left[\sum _{j=0}^{n_{i}-1}{\frac {1}{j!}}\phi _{i}^{(j)}(\lambda _{i})\left(A-\lambda _{i}I\right)^{j}\prod _{j=1,j\neq i}^{s}\left(A-\lambda _{j}I\right)^{n_{j}}\right]}

,

where

ϕ

i

(

t

)

:=

f

(

t

)

/

∏

j

≠

i

(

t

−

λ

j

)

n

j

{\displaystyle \phi _{i}(t):=f(t)/\prod _{j\neq i}\left(t-\lambda _{j}\right)^{n_{j}}}

.

A concise form is further given by Hans Schwerdtfeger,

f

(

A

)

=

∑

i

=

1

s

A

i

∑

j

=

0

n

i

−

1

f

(

j

)

(

λ

i

)

j

!

Editorial summary

“Sylvester's formula” enters the record as formula in matrix theory. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sylvester's, formula and Formula can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 593-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sylvester's, formula and Formula.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sylvester's formula” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sylvester's, formula and Formula provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7660748. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sylvester's formula”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sylvester's formula primary sources, Sylvester's formula archive and Sylvester's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sylvester's formula”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sylvester's formula” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.