Sylvester's formula
Formula in matrix theory

In matrix theory, Sylvester's formula or Sylvester's matrix theorem (named after J. J. Sylvester) or Lagrange−Sylvester interpolation expresses an analytic function f (A) of a matrix A as a polynomial in A, in terms of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A. It states that
f
(
A
)
=
∑
i
=
1
k
f
(
λ
i
)
A
i
,
{\displaystyle f(A)=\sum _{i=1}^{k}f(\lambda _{i})~A_{i}~,}
where the λi are the eigenvalues of A, and the matrices
A
i
≡
∏
j
=
1
j
≠
i
k
1
λ
i
−
λ
j
(
A
−
λ
j
I
)
{\displaystyle A_{i}\equiv \prod _{j=1 \atop j\neq i}^{k}{\frac {1}{\lambda _{i}-\lambda _{j}}}\left(A-\lambda _{j}I\right)}
are the corresponding Frobenius covariants of A, which are (projection) matrix Lagrange polynomials of A.
Conditions
Sylvester's formula applies for any diagonalizable matrix A with k distinct eigenvalues, λ1, ..., λk, and any function f defined on some subset of the complex numbers such that f(A) is well defined. The last condition means that every eigenvalue λi is in the domain of f, and that every eigenvalue λi with multiplicity mi > 1 is in the interior of the domain, with f being (mi - 1) times differentiable at λi.
Example
Consider the two-by-two matrix:
A
=
[
1
3
4
2
]
.
{\displaystyle A={\begin{bmatrix}1&3\\4&2\end{bmatrix}}.}
This matrix has two eigenvalues, 5 and −2. Its Frobenius covariants are
A
1
=
c
1
r
1
=
[
3
4
]
[
1
7
1
7
]
=
[
3
7
3
7
4
7
4
7
]
=
A
+
2
I
5
−
(
−
2
)
A
2
=
c
2
r
2
=
[
1
7
−
1
7
]
[
4
−
3
]
=
[
4
7
−
3
7
−
4
7
3
7
]
=
A
−
5
I
−
2
−
5
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}A_{1}&=c_{1}r_{1}={\begin{bmatrix}3\\4\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {1}{7}}&{\frac {1}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {3}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\\{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {4}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\frac {A+2I}{5-(-2)}}\\A_{2}&=c_{2}r_{2}={\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {1}{7}}\\-{\frac {1}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}4&-3\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {4}{7}}&-{\frac {3}{7}}\\-{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\frac {A-5I}{-2-5}}.\end{aligned}}}
Sylvester's formula then amounts to
f
(
A
)
=
f
(
5
)
A
1
+
f
(
−
2
)
A
2
.
{\displaystyle f(A)=f(5)A_{1}+f(-2)A_{2}.\,}
For instance, if f is defined by f(x) = x−1, then Sylvester's formula expresses the matrix inverse f(A) = A−1 as
1
5
[
3
7
3
7
4
7
4
7
]
−
1
2
[
4
7
−
3
7
−
4
7
3
7
]
=
[
−
0.2
0.3
0.4
−
0.1
]
.
{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{5}}{\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {3}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\\{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {4}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}-{\frac {1}{2}}{\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {4}{7}}&-{\frac {3}{7}}\\-{\frac {4}{7}}&{\frac {3}{7}}\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}-0.2&0.3\\0.4&-0.1\end{bmatrix}}.}
Generalization
Sylvester's formula is only valid for matrices with no repeated eigenvalues; an extension due to Arthur Buchheim, based on Hermite interpolating polynomials, covers the general case:
f
(
A
)
=
∑
i
=
1
s
[
∑
j
=
0
n
i
−
1
1
j
!
ϕ
i
(
j
)
(
λ
i
)
(
A
−
λ
i
I
)
j
∏
j
=
1
,
j
≠
i
s
(
A
−
λ
j
I
)
n
j
]
{\displaystyle f(A)=\sum _{i=1}^{s}\left[\sum _{j=0}^{n_{i}-1}{\frac {1}{j!}}\phi _{i}^{(j)}(\lambda _{i})\left(A-\lambda _{i}I\right)^{j}\prod _{j=1,j\neq i}^{s}\left(A-\lambda _{j}I\right)^{n_{j}}\right]}
,
where
ϕ
i
(
t
)
:=
f
(
t
)
/
∏
j
≠
i
(
t
−
λ
j
)
n
j
{\displaystyle \phi _{i}(t):=f(t)/\prod _{j\neq i}\left(t-\lambda _{j}\right)^{n_{j}}}
.
A concise form is further given by Hans Schwerdtfeger,
f
(
A
)
=
∑
i
=
1
s
A
i
∑
j
=
0
n
i
−
1
f
(
j
)
(
λ
i
)
j
!
“Sylvester's formula” enters the record as formula in matrix theory. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sylvester's, formula and Formula can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Sylvester's formula” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sylvester's, formula and Formula provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7660748. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Sylvester's formula”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Sylvester's formula primary sources, Sylvester's formula archive and Sylvester's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sylvester's formula”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Sylvester's formula” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.