CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ladislaus II

Wikimedia disambiguation page

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 14, 2020
Entity authorityQ1060341
Source-derived summary

Ladislaus II (also spelled Vladislav II or Władysław II) may refer to:

Władysław II the Exile (1105–1159), Duke of Poland and Silesia

Ladislaus II of Hungary (1131–1163), king of Hungary from 1162 to 1163

Vladislaus II of Bohemia (died 1174), second king of Bohemia

Vladislav II of Serbia (c. 1280–1325), Serbian monarch

Władysław II of Opole (c. 1332–1401), Duke of Opole

Wladyslaw II Jagiello, a.k.a. Jogaila (1351–1434), Grand Duke of Lithuania and King of Poland

Vladislaus II of Bohemia and Hungary (1456–1516), King of Bohemia and King of Hungary

Vladislav II of Wallachia, Prince of Wallachia (d.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Ladislaus II” as wikimedia disambiguation page. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1105, 1159, 1131, 1163—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Ladislaus, Wikimedia and disambiguation can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as wikimedia disambiguation page. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 14, 2020. The linked authority identifier is Q1060341. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1105, 1159, 1131 and 1163.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ladislaus II”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ladislaus II primary sources, Ladislaus II archive and Ladislaus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ladislaus II”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ladislaus II” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.