CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Hepcidin

protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ14882371
Source-derived summary

Hepcidin is a protein that in humans is encoded by the HAMP gene. Hepcidin is a key regulator of the entry of iron into the circulation in mammals.

During conditions in which the hepcidin level is abnormally high, such as inflammation, serum iron falls due to iron trapping within macrophages and liver cells and decreased gut iron absorption. This typically leads to anemia due to an inadequate amount of blood serum iron being available for developing red blood cells. When the hepcidin level is abnormally low, such as in hemochromatosis, iron overload occurs due to increased ferroportin mediated iron efflux from storage and increased gut iron absorption.

Structure

Hepcidin is initially synthesized as an 84-amino acid preprohormone (preprohepcidin) which undergoes sequential cleavages to form the active, mature hormone. The first cleavage by signal peptidase removes the 24-amino acid N-terminal signal peptide, creating a 60-amino acid prohepcidin. Furin-like convertase and α-1 antitrypsin then cleave prohepcidin to remove a 35-amino acid proregion, resulting in the 25-amino acid mature, bioactive hepcidin. There are also shorter isoforms of hepcidin, with 20 and 22 amino acids, which have minimal iron regulatory activity. Only the 9 N-terminal amino acids are essential for hepcidin's biological activity, specifically its ability to bind to ferroportin and regulate iron metabolism.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Hepcidin” as protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 210-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Hepcidin, protein-coding and gene can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14882371. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Hepcidin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Hepcidin primary sources, Hepcidin archive and Hepcidin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hepcidin”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Hepcidin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.