CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

L-W-F Model H Owl

1920s American biplane

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 18, 2025
Entity authorityQ85775263 ↗
Source-derived summary

The L-W-F Model H Owl was a large American twin-boom trimotor biplane designed and built by LWF Engineering as a mail plane in 1920, but after being rejected for that role, the single prototype was sold to the United States Army Air Service for evaluation as a bomber but failed to secure any orders.

Design and development

It had a center nacelle with room for three crew members suspended on struts between the wings and flanked on either side by similarly braced tail booms. All three fuselages had a Liberty L-12 400 hp (300 kW) engine in the nose, and were fabricated from laminated wood in the same manner as had been used in prior LWF fuselage designs, with three thin layers of wood laid at an angle to each other and separated with fabric.

The four bay biplane wings were fitted with ailerons on both upper and lower wings.

It had a biplane horizontal stabilizer with three rudders, and ailerons on all four wings. No fin was provided for the center rudder. All controls were given generous aerodynamic counterbalances to reduce control forces. The initial six-wheel undercarriage was later modified to four-wheels, and the radiator for the center engine was moved from in front of the pilot to between the engine and the propeller.

Operational history

The Owl was first flown by Ernest Harmon from Mitchel Field, on Long Island, New York, on 22 May 1920.

Although built for night air mail service (hence being named Owl), it failed to interest the Post Office.

Editorial summary

“L-W-F Model H Owl” enters the record as 1920s American biplane. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what L-W-F, Model and 1920s can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1920—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around L-W-F, Model and 1920s.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“L-W-F Model H Owl” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, L-W-F, Model and 1920s provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q85775263. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1920.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “L-W-F Model H Owl”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow L-W-F Model H Owl primary sources, L-W-F Model H Owl archive and L-W-F research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “L-W-F Model H Owl”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “L-W-F Model H Owl” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.