CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Kwatha

village in Manipur

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ134580653
Source-derived summary

Kwatha, also known as Kwatha Khunjao and Kwatha Meetei, is a village in Tengnoupal district of Manipur, India. Kwatha is notable for being the only Meitei-majority settlement in the hill regions of Manipur, as Meitei people predominantly live in the Imphal valley. It is situated approximately 16 to 18 kilometers from Moreh, a town on the Indo-Myanmar border.

Etymology

The name “Kwatha” (ꯀ꯭ꯋꯥꯊꯥ) is derived from the Meitei language word Kwa (ꯀ꯭ꯋꯥ), meaning “betel nut.” The early settlers are believed to have engaged in betel nut cultivation, which influenced the naming of the village.

Historical background

The village is believed to date back to the reign of King Senbi Kiyamba (ꯁꯦꯟꯕꯤ ꯀꯤꯌꯥꯝꯕ, 1467–1508), during which it functioned as a strategic meeting point between the Meitei kingdom and the rulers of Burma (present-day Myanmar). According to tradition, a symbolic exchange of a flowering plant between the two kings is said to have led to the initial settlement of Meitei people in the area, forming the basis of the current village population.

Demographics and Governance

As of March 2025, Kwatha comprises 87 households with a population of approximately 437 residents. The village maintains a traditional governance system in which a village head (often referred to as a king) plays a central role in community decisions.

As of 2023, the village has a population of 370 residents.

As of December 2019, the village currently has 75 clans, with a population of 382 people and 160 eligible voters.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Kwatha” is village in Manipur. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Kwatha, village and Manipur, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1467, 1508, 2025, 2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Kwatha, village and Manipur is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “village in Manipur” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q134580653. Authority coordinates are 24.336, 94.278. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1467, 1508, 2025 and 2023.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kwatha”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kwatha primary sources, Kwatha archive and Kwatha research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kwatha”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Kwatha” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.