Kuki–Paite Conflict
1997–1998 ethnic conflict in Manipur, India
The Kuki–Paite Conflict, also called Kuki–Zomi Conflict, was an ethnic conflict during 1997–1998 between tribal communities in Churachandpur district in Manipur, India. The cause of the conflict may be regarded as the desire for leadership within the tribes, pitting one group that subscribed to the Kuki label against another group that subscribed to the Zomi label, the latter being led by the Paites. The conflict started in June 1997 and lasted for over a year, during which 352 people died, thousands of homes were destroyed and over 13,000 people were displaced. The Government of India sent in the Indian Army to attempt to stop the violence, but peace was restored in September–October 1998 only with the initiative of the Church.
Background
In 1948, 21 tribes of Manipur that shared the "Kuki" label per the British nomenclature formed a joint organisation called Kuki Company based at Kuki Inn in Imphal. After the formation, however, frictions began to develop due to the predominance of the Thadou language in the grouping. As a result, some 14 tribes left the group and formed a separate Khul Union.
After the rise of the United Naga Council and NSCN-IM in the 1980s, some of the tribes that had been called "Old Kuki" in the British nomenclature quit the Kuki umbrella and joined the Naga grouping.
Seven "Zo Ethnic" tribes, stood on their own for some time, but eventually adopted the Zomi label. These seven tribes, including Hmar, Zou, Vaiphei, Gangte, Simte, Paite and a collection of smaller tribes that simply called themselves "Zomi", formed the Zomi Re-unification Organisation (ZRO) in 1995.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Kuki–Paite Conflict” is 1997–1998 ethnic conflict in Manipur, India. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Kuki, Paite and Conflict, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “1997–1998 ethnic conflict in Manipur, India” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16253214. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1997, 1998, 1948 and 1995.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Kuki–Paite Conflict”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Kuki–Paite Conflict primary sources, Kuki–Paite Conflict archive and Kuki research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kuki–Paite Conflict”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Kuki–Paite Conflict” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.