Krćevac
village in Šumadija, Serbia

Krćevac (Serbian: Крћевац) is a village in the Topola municipality of the Šumadija District in central Serbia, located 3.9 km from Zagorica and 5.2 km from Topola.
Etymology
The name "Krćevac" stems from krčanje meaning "burning/clearing of forest". The region of Šumadija is densely wooded and so the village owes its name to the intense forest clearing effort that was undertaken when the area was settled. Local lore holds that the area of today's Krćevac burned for three months before the land became clear for farming.
History
The village was active in the Serbian Revolution, being organized into the knežina (administrative unit) of Kačer during the First Serbian Uprising (1804–13). Gavrilo Đurić (1775–1835), who slew the Kragujevac mutesellim, was from Krćevac. The Ottomans called the village a "house of hajduks" (ajdučka kuća) due to the wooded village serving as a safe haven for rebels in the uprising.
Prince Alexander Karađorđević had a fountain built in the village on 29 September 1858, on a farm field that he had inherited from his father, the leader of the uprising, Karađorđe Petrović. That land was later sold by the rival House of Obrenović.
Demographics
According to the 1991 census data, the population was 794.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Krćevac” as village in Šumadija, Serbia. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the places & architecture register because the source frames it as village in Šumadija, Serbia. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 25, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3104954. Authority coordinates are 44.301, 20.688. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1804, 1775, 1835 and 1858.
Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.
- Historic place names
- Jurisdictional context
- Routes into maps and plans
Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Krćevac”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Krćevac primary sources, Krćevac archive and Krćevac research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Krćevac”?
- What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
- Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Krćevac” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.