CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Turquoise cichlid

species of Actinopterygii

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ25038653
Source-derived summary

The turquoise cichlid (Kronoheros umbriferus), also known as the umbee cichlid, is a species of cichlid fish found in freshwater habitats of eastern Panama and central and western Colombia. It is commonly caught as a food fish, and sometimes kept in aquariums. This robust fish is the largest cichlid native to its range, up to 12 kg (26 lb) in weight and 80 cm (2.6 ft) long, and in the Americas only certain peacock bass and the wolf cichlid may reach a greater size. Females of the turquoise cichlid remain significantly smaller than males. It is strongly predatory, typically feeding on fish and other small animals, but it may also take fruits and seeds.

Taxonomy and appearance

This cichlid was first scientifically described in 1913 based on specimens from the Cupe River, which is a part of the Tuira River basin in Panama. It was placed in Cichlasoma, which at the time was a wastebasket genus. As the species clearly belonged elsewhere, it was subsequently moved to Heros or Caquetaia, until finally being moved to its own genus Kronoheros in 2016.

It is currently the only recognized species in the genus Kronoheros, but it is likely it will be split into at least two separate species, as there are significant variations in the appearance and genetic studies have shown clear differences between those from the Tuira River of Panama and the Atrato River of Colombia (genetic data is lacking for other populations).

Adults have an iridescent light-spotted pattern, but the extent and color hue varies.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Turquoise cichlid” is species of Actinopterygii. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Turquoise, cichlid and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1913, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Turquoise, cichlid and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of Actinopterygii” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q25038653. The first chronological checks are 1913 and 2016.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Turquoise cichlid”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Turquoise cichlid primary sources, Turquoise cichlid archive and Turquoise research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Turquoise cichlid”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Turquoise cichlid” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.