Tina Burner
American drag performer
Kristian Seeber (born November 10, 1980), known professionally as Tina Burner, is an American drag performer most known for appearing in Shade: Queens of NYC, on the thirteenth season of RuPaul's Drag Race, and on the tenth season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars. He was a part of a boy band named 5th Ring.
Early life
Seeber was born and raised in Lowville, New York.
Career
Seeber used to be in a boy band. Tina Burner has been named National Miss Comedy Queen and competed on thirteenth season of RuPaul's Drag Race, where she was eliminated in episode 11 and finished in seventh place. She also worked with fashion designer Nicolas Putvinski for a time.
In 2021, Tina Burner was nominated for a 2021 MAC Award for Best Recording (LaMott Friedman Award) for their album and tour Maybe This Time.
In 2022, Tina Burner toured the world with their show, Witch Perfect with fellow RPDR stars Scarlet Envy and Alexis Michelle. Written by Tina Burner and writing partner Blake Allen, the show is a parody of the Disney movie Hocus Pocus. With Allen, Tina Burner wrote Farmyard Follies.
The public source identifies “Tina Burner” as american drag performer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Tina, Burner and American.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Tina Burner”, the useful work is to connect “american drag performer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q105061784. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1980, 2021 and 2022.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Tina Burner”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Tina Burner primary sources, Tina Burner archive and Tina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tina Burner”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Tina Burner” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.