CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Krisis (journal)

philosophical journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ2450715 ↗
Source-derived summary

Krisis is a peer-reviewed open-access academic journal covering mainly continental contemporary philosophy, publishing articles in both Dutch and English. The focus of Krisis is in the field of social, cultural, and political thought, featuring articles that show the relevance of classical thinkers for contemporary problems. In recent decades, Krisis increasingly published original contributions in the political and social philosophy, cultural theory, philosophy of science and technology, and (partly born in the Netherlands) empirical philosophy.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Krisis (journal)” is philosophical journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Krisis, journal and philosophical, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 74-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1980-01-01. For this dossier, Krisis, journal and philosophical is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “philosophical journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2450715. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Krisis (journal)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Krisis (journal) primary sources, Krisis (journal) archive and Krisis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Krisis (journal)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Krisis (journal)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.